Is there any reason we're calling it sign in with ethereum rather than sign in with insert-asymmetric-key-encryption-algorithm? Technically you're signing in with an ECDSA key-pair that just so happens to be used by Ethereum. You could swap ECDSA for any asymmetric key algorithm.

co-founder stelo.com. theoretical cs phd dropout. into math, music, ml, macro, markets, surfing, writing amandhesi.net

Takes like these completely ignore that we should aim to onboard non-technical people

Copy is a huge part of UX enabling that

Y’all out here making protocols and actions sound like weapons instead of easy to use features

dutch guy building tools for web3, sometimes in nyc 🍎/ sometimes in rotterdam 🇳🇱. co-founder at basement. 🐦 nickvernij.twitter

As a developer I agree. 

But the reality is that many wallets market themselves as an Ethereum wallet, users recognize brands like Ethereum better.

I’d love “sign in with wallet” or whatever, curious to see how this evolves. (Not that i love the ‘wallet’ terminology, different discussion tho hahaha)

That is not an argument in favor of “sign in with ethereum”.

Call it “sign in with device” for example. The point here is that SIWE has nothing to do with ethereum. 

It needs to be conceptualized from first principles, not tacked on to ethereum.