growth

Founders

do you realize each and every type of interaction, media distribution and the like over-collateralized into a spectre of monolithic subscription funnel that offers neither modularity not elasticity when it comes to alles Farcaster?

Creator and ownership economies of ever-emergentist nature shall not offer a myriad of monolithic gates that are labeled as modular just because legos are abundant in numbers.

Yup, you can pay upfront for certain services such as an all-in-one growth & analytics SaaS, or a WaaS that offers the best, or any API tools for building a brand—or you can subscribe to the creators or "clubs" who & that offer the fun, art, culture, and the services you find fulfilling.

You can race to bid to enter that novel app the first, and the like. Yet, the fact that some builders, developers and the founders think each and every click & share i make should come with premia of all sorts.

I honestly cancelled 99% of my subs here. It's because some generalists spend more than founders.

apparently everyone is OK paying for every flatulation they pass as a passage from Finnegans Wake. Seriously, there are some barriers to real group beyond some deserted islands a la deleuze et guattari in this direction.

generalist solopreneur 🏝️ growth @kingpost /kingpost 🌞 /gokhan /philosophy /openfinance

| NL: concepts.network

I think it's a combination of

- unfiltered optimism
- tech illiteracy
- desire for “community”
- pandering to trends (tip coins, etc)

that people are willing to take in anything afforded their way to be a part of something. With attention being so scarce, quantity over quality is unfortunately a working strategy.

father, husband, css golfer, ux engineer, silently defining variables as /sdv sdv.wtf

at the end of the day, i think, these are also the factors that contribute to the fraud triangle. tech illiteracy is really something that can be overcome here. we gotta do sth but i just wanna exercise, nerd over new DeFi primitives, and well grow some products and enjoy some mobility.

I'm personally at odds with tech literacy as I'd love for people to be more informed with something that has very consequential effects everyday life, yet also believe the best technologies require the least amount of explaining.

It's a delicate balance to strike as someone working on tech for humans