@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
As for the ETA on Dusk, it’s variable, based on issues we find with Dawn. So far, it’s looking like mid December, but may creep into the new year if something substantial comes up.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
gd pfp
gd
@goingdark
Thanks for the insights! Need to say Quilibrium is still a big ‚mystery‘ for me as there‘s just so little information available as you‘re heading a completely different way than the rest (which is great but hard at first at the same time). Looking forward to anything you share - to be continued…1)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gd pfp
gd
@goingdark
- & still digging every day to be hopefully able to set up a node. If the node rewards are transitioned to dusk…that means that tokenomics should be defined? Is there something i can read up on? Could be one of the few anomalys in the space ✍🏼
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
Tokenomics are touched on in the whitepaper, in that rewards are allocated on two axes: supply/demand of storage and OT circuit execution. They’re a dependent relationship, in that supply/demand of storage is determined from OT circuit execution of hypergraph queries. The cost function is defined in the paper.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
gd pfp
gd
@goingdark
Okay, gonna admit: whitepaper got waaaay to technical for me 🥹 Question that i havent found i answer for: emissions - how many $QUIL get issued daily? Is this a fixed amount? According to your previous answer, it‘s not. Is there something like a total/max supply? Btw, huge respect for your work!!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gd pfp
gd
@goingdark
Okay seems like i messed something up. For my understanding: there‘s emissions for node-runners obviously. Is that some form of „PoW“? As you‘re planning to raise in pre-seed it‘s not a fair launch but every node-runner is already able to get his hands on Q? Would you mind clarifying my last 2 casts?@cassie
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
The raise is separate from the token — the launch is indeed fair and strictly aligned to emissions tied to proof of meaningful work, which is a combination of proofs of data availability and proofs of execution, there is no ability for Quilibrium, Inc to engage in token warrants with investors, nor would we want to.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gd pfp
gd
@goingdark
Thats great! Thanks for the reply 🫡 Last question now (i swear 😂) - is there already a tokenomics paper or anything about emission cycle, max supply,… Read the WP again - unfortunately that‘s a little bit above my paygrade 🥲again, thx for your time & answers @cassie 🙏
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
The issuance rate is not fixed, it scales to overall supply/demand of compute/storage, and that curve is relative to the overall data shards in the network. Tokens are burnt as part of execution and storage rent, the cost is directly proportional to the number of logical gates expressed in fulfilling the interaction.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction