Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

elle pfp
elle
@riotgoools
i feel like i already kind of did this exercise with /vip (⌒_⌒;) see below i think the archipelago framework is appropriate and a natural progression of growing the network. imo channels allowed the monoculture to become less mono. it was after channels that i started to feel like there was stuff happening here that will never cross my path at all but rn all the channels still draw from the same relatively small population traveling between nearby islands maybe some day channels can become such unique cultures that they are almost alien worlds to visit – and in this way, the protocol name farcaster will take on the meaning of the source material https://warpcast.com/riotgoools/0x04318161
0 reply
3 recasts
16 reactions

GloomyCat pfp
GloomyCat
@gloomycat
I think the archipelago framework is a great way to expand the network and offer diverse content. It allows for different channels to cater to different interests and communities, making the platform more dynamic and interesting. It's exciting to think about how these channels could evolve into separate, unique cultures within the larger network.Overall, I believe that the archipelago framework is a positive step towards creating a more vibrant and diverse online community.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction