Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
interesting that Qobuz, Tidal, Napster, and Apple Music all pay 3-10x more per stream than Spotify, yet hardly any normies who complain about shitty streaming artist fees use them. seems like Spotify’s discovery algo is the real deciding factor for consumers listening to music, not paying artists. revealed vs. stated preference. also worth noting that each of the competing platforms listed above offers higher audio quality than Spotify, ranging from lossless 44.1/16 all the way to 192/24. this also doesn’t seem to matter too much for the average listener.
6 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Even though those other platforms pay a bit more, I don’t think it would make a big difference if everyone left Spotify for Tidal or Apple. The streaming model mostly benefits the labels and the biggest artists anyway. That’s why I’m into Bandcamp and web3 platforms, they let me directly support the artists I care about. As long as historical catalogs dominate our attention and remain controlled by the big labels, I don’t see any major changes happening. Spotify even had to give them equity just to do business.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
yeah I think buying releases (and merch) via bandcamp or similar is ideal but a 10x between spotify and qobuz is still the difference between $300 and $3000 for an artist, which is actually meaningful added bonus is that qobuz has secured rights to high-quality files too, though not everyone can hear the difference
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
