Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Thoughtful criticism, backed by data, got some of us blackballed on Farcaster. I love the idea of a decentralized protocol, but when power and attention are concentrated within an opinionated client, decentralization doesn’t really exist in practice. And if everyone spends the majority of their time on a single client, can you truly call it a protocol?
3 replies
3 recasts
12 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> And if everyone spends the majority of their time on a single client, can you truly call it a protocol? Base launching a Farcaster feed in CB Wallet will change this. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x3ea95b82
1 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Love to see a well funded team taking a chance. But I didn’t join yesterday. There any many more dead clients. And the clients I use the most today (Recaster + Tunecaster) both depend on Neynar infrastructure which is a good or bad thing depending on how you want to look at it. Neynar isn’t fully independent from Merkle, I believe you are investors which can be a conflict.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> Neynar isn’t fully independent from Merkle They are and that's a claim without evidence.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
So Neynar can push changes to the protocol without your permission? And investment in Neynar means you have no influence?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
rish
@rish
Dan has one of the smallest checks in the company and he invested in a company that wasn't even building FC infra. We were building something else at that time and he just wanted to support. If we were going to be influenced by investor checks, there are much larger investors to worry about.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions