This also means that if you are targeting engagement with high SCS users, there are only a few hundred people that actually matter. It's the ones you probably already know about. Of course it depends on how these scores are used in other apps, but the skew is real.

Moxie doesn't reward content based on quality

It simply provides a few hundred accounts disproportionate power to distribute the token based on the accounts with which they engage https://warpcast.com/0xt0ny/0x60e6fee3

Sometimes that power happens to reward (objectively) quality content (e.g. @mazmhussain)

But to say Moxie's design rewards the highest quality content simply isn't accurate

Writer, podcaster, and commentator on foreign affairs and politics. Runs /dropglobalnews

Please support: https://www.dropsitenews.com/

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

Bingo! I also think that how the SCV score is calculated should have been disclosed before the token launch. If you’re going to give a bunch of users the power to distribute money that isn’t actually theirs, people should know how that system works. 

I've said this before: printing a token and using a social graph for the airdrop isn't very innovative. The Moxie team definitely put more thought into it than the degen team did, but to me, they are still just speculative memecoins with a slightly different distribution style.

that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me :)

oh btw, you just earned some Moxie

Working on Moxie at Airstack| airstack.xyz | moxie.xyz | hihi! 


The proof is written in the protocol. My love and contributions go all the way back to the Jam days :)