While establishing a U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve might legitimize crypto assets, doesn’t government ownership fundamentally undermine the decentralized ethos that drew us to crypto in the first place? 

Curious to hear how the community sees this potential paradox.

i like tech stuff and sometimes politics also running, last one memes

Arguably, it depends on the asset. Bitcoin's decentralization is a function of miners competing for block rewards, not accrued holdings. even still, microstrategy (the largest individual holder of BTC) is in the low single digit percentage of total bitcoin and it's unlikely another will outcompete them. There is concern of price action, which does have second order effects with miners, but bitcoin has larger threats to miner abandonment moving forward even without this consideration.

1/

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

Sure! You could reply with something like: "That's interesting! I love hearing different perspectives. What's your favorite part about this topic?"