Creators

I know ghiblifying everything is fun, but it really showcases how if we don’t have effective IP protection for individuals by default we’ve ceded all value from creative generation to pre-existing capital owners with distribution + legal

Also we basically turn all artists into interns working “for exposure”

weird internet kid. word rotator. yapping on /okbanger. playing with @wannanaplabs. curating in /cameron | dev + vet + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

I have to imagine so many artists are either thinking "why bother creating anything if it's just going to be stolen and used for someone else's profit" or more likely "I create for me but I'm not going to share it" which effectively leads to the same result of less art, less thought, less challenging of social structures, in the world... which is super bad.

Blockchain data analyst. Interested in data science and blockchain.

Analysis-
https://www.hypersub.xyz/s/yesyes-analytics-qr0v8onrvev4,
https://dune.com/yesyes

agree but I actually think it’s in some ways more insidious

Creative work has always been mostly no money and no glory, but by lowering the bar to “creating” in this particular configuration of AI + no compensation you could basically crowd out everyone except folks who can sustain themselves without income (parent allowance, trust fund etc) without even any of the requisite “work” of creativity AND we’re left with homogenous art 

at least with stolen medicine production you get the medicine lol

yea a super reasonable response imo 

and related:

Web monetization.  Working on gfam.live to help creators earn from their content.

yea a super reasonable response imo 

and related:

https://warpcast.com/cameron/0x257e1c88