I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

I spam accounts? You cherry picked my replies and are calling me out for spamming

If these accounts don’t engage me, why am i not marked as spam yet?

I have 20k moxie points which i got from one conversation with one person @mikedemarais.eth where I actually was involved in a genuine educative conversation

Why do people like you love to pick on small accounts when you see the progressing and try to bring them down?

This post you made is the literal definition of moxie baiting without research and it’s ugly.

You reply guy accounts (most of which don't follow you) with high Far Scores, yes

I am sure your cast volume directed at high Far Score accounts is pure coincidence!

You reply guy accounts (most of which don't follow you) with high Far Scores, yes

I am sure your cast volume directed at high Far Score accounts is pure coincidence! https://warpcast.com/traguy.eth/0x6d84d874

I don't really get this line of criticism. Replying to large or famous accounts is a tried and true way to grow when you are new to a social network. 

Are you suggesting that people shouldn't try to grow because some third party has instituted a reward mechanism for behavior that was once viewed as commonplace?

I usually vibe with your takes but this one has me scratching my head. Everyone wants to grow their account.

GenX animal lover. Bitcoin '13. Reformed digital marketer. Into art, books, travel, and kindness. Highly skeptical of current crypto landscape.

I don’t, but I am trying to understand it. :)

The real issue appears to be Moxie, not users continuing their usual behavior on social networks.

No matter how they adjust their algorithm, there will always be those who exploit it through inauthentic activity. It’s par for the course when financial incentives are involved. But broadening the criticism to target typical user behavior seems like attacking the problem from the wrong end.