UcheⓂ️🍖⚡🎭🌈 🎩
@gconcept
1/2 Well, come to think of spamming and value extraction, I think we are really misplacing priority here. If we can critically look at the level of value extraction, we would see that the people labeled as spammers are not actually the ones extracting the most value from the system (degen). It's rather those people you pamper, the ones with high social graph. These are the ones your algorithm allocates outrageous rewards to. I was shocked to see someone earning as much as 1,000,000 $Degen per month. I so much believe there are more people extracting as much or even more than that. These are the people that have continued to dump $Degen. Now the system is reacting to the exploit, we turn around to victimise those who are even not taking out up 10k $degen per month. Those who have come up with this spam label to divert attention from the main issue are the people I consider the main enemy of Degen project.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
UcheⓂ️🍖⚡🎭🌈 🎩
@gconcept
/2 If the truth must be told, and if we really want to make progress, there is need to stop applying OpenRank or Social graph or whatever it's called. Let's work out a sustainable reward percentage. Let rewards be proportional to the volume each user has locked or staked. Rewards should not be based on social graph because those with high social graph are using it to drain the system. As it stands, tipping doesn't add value to the project any more, so let's scrap it. I wish you the best in your effort to keep the project up.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
