I do not understand why Brantly and Esk3nder are picking this fight with @dwr.ethth and @v 

Farcaster is one of the more successful projects to leverage ENS. Instead of critiquing how "ENS-aligned" FC is, perhaps it would be better for the ENS team to reflect on the limitations of ENS that Farcaster had to overcome.

there's some confusion around farcaster names, so let me clear this up: 

- your username on farcaster is ALWAYS an ENS name
- one kind of ens name is the farcaster name (v.farcaster.eth shown in client as @v)  
- the other kind of ens name is the L1 name (dwr.eth shown in client as @dwr.eth)

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

https://names.degen.tips/name/v

I think you should then get your degen.eth ENS subs and add support for ENS subdomains to be used as your farcaster username. degen.eth subs actually live on Degenchain and resolve via CCIP. The parent (degen.eth) is locked in a multisig and held by @jacek @degen and @coopahtroopa.eth

Onchain is the new online - FID 206 -  cooprecords.xyz

Artist, Director, Degen. AOTM Gallery /glitch /digital-art /video-art /jake