Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Feels like there will be native transactions on Warpcast with an embedded wallet very soon $HIGHER
3 replies
2 recasts
22 reactions

Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Ya the only answer I have to combat the need for $5/$3/any$ signup cost is the eventually provide passive yield on deposited assets. You could do this via a native yield bearing stable coin or just dump the deposits into aave product or similar. The social layer and in feed txs are here, now tell Gary to suck it and turn Warpcast into a yield product with integrations to base apps in feed. @dwr.eth I’ve already built this and can provide some good insight if you ever go this direction πŸ‘€ https://youtu.be/xVq3j6bSeKs
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Wow yeah this would be awesome! Imagine that a user deposited $20-$100 to sign up to warpcast and part of it went into a yield vault that could generate enough yield to pay for its yearly storage costs
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
They can do this right now out of box. I’m assuming they have also had this idea and it’s prob been a regulatory concern issue.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction