Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Goldy ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
am I wrong to conclude that the system built for the fork was extremely flawed at minority protection if the majority could always just move or hold the threshold too high to be useful?
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
The motivation for this aspect had a lot to do with legal advise we received
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Yea kinda ironic that the legal advice now is “no forks whatsoever”
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

gami.eth pfp
gami.eth
@gami.eth
it’s almost as if the advice could provoke legal action and result in more billable hours lmao
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Goldy ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
I don’t find it surprising or unreasonable that advice would change over time as a result of changes in either environment or subject.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Did anything change though?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gami.eth pfp
gami.eth
@gami.eth
Well that’s the thing. We pay the bills but we don’t get the disclosures. If indeed there are changes, we may never know. Just a bit of an awkward arrangement. Conflicting motivations all round.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Goldy ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Goldy ⌐◨-◨
@goldy
Yes I was about to say something similar. It is indeed awkward. My guess is that advisors advice (or require?) all the advice to not be publicised. Which is a tough arrangement for a DAO
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction