Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gakonst pfp
gakonst
@gakonst
Technical AMA - will respond to any technical Q about blockchains, vms, performance, privacy, security, tooling, open source etc. Hoping to meet programmers or architects with similar interests at the frontier :)
43 replies
16 recasts
96 reactions

Sheldon Trotman pfp
Sheldon Trotman
@sheldon
What’s your take on how/if the EVM could adopt parallel execution or is this something that is better done off L1 and tested on L2s (like we currently see experimentation around)?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

gakonst pfp
gakonst
@gakonst
You can do parevm without consensus changes, so IMO it'll make it's way everywhere in some form. Others may do breaking changes to improve it further.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sheldon Trotman pfp
Sheldon Trotman
@sheldon
Really? When you refer to parevm is this actual multithreaded compute that could have localized fee markets? I was under the impression that w/ the EVM being single threaded unless you do something like have devs preannounce the addresses they touch (similar to solana) you are forced to make consensus mechanism changes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction