Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
raw thoughts on the new direction: - I think it'll push channels to develop their own unique identities - I like splitting up hosts / members / followers and making it clear in the UI who is in / out. helps curate the vibe and give credit to contributors. - more ppl will cast w/o a channel now and that is better. reduces "where to cast this" decision fatigue. fewer steps -> easier to cast -> more casts it'll take work and friction to retrain the userbase, but I think this a strongly positive move. Right now channels are trying to be two things at once, better to pick one and go with it.
6 replies
16 recasts
25 reactions
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
i agree, after our last conversation, and these updates i like the idea now the only issue i have is this. should replies be open to everyone or just channel members? what do you think https://warpcast.com/fwkiraa.eth/0xddb88361
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
Here's what I would do: - make replies open but clearly highlight / sort who is a member in the UI - put an optional button in the composer to limit replies to members or mods - quoting outside channel should always be allowed, even if not a member
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
why should non members be able to quote a cast i specifically put in a channel for mainly members?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
because it's a free society, you're allowed to have thoughts on something said in a group, even if you're not a member of it.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
that’s a valid point. i agree with all three, hope it gets implemented.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
