welter pfp
welter
@fun
RE: the reputation score i just launched 1. i made it in less than an hour 2. it's strictly based on FC OG follows i agree it's a bad indicator, but i'm glad i launched it because now i have all this valuable feedback from a bunch of people, now i know what it should be and what it shouldn't be only up from here
18 replies
4 recasts
51 reactions

welter pfp
welter
@fun
for v2, i'm thinking 25% FC OG follows 50% cast quality 25% account history cast quality - negative points for any low quality casts (f4f, follow back, etc) - positive points for high engagement - etc account history - average # of casts per month/week - total days on farcaster - etc
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂  pfp
J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂
@jvaleska.eth
feedback on v2: so, replying someone with ty! would make reputation decrease? I think measure low quality casts is not as easy as it initially looks.. there are tons of situations where a "low" effort cast is not a low effort cast, and, there are some reasons for not casting high quality casts all the time.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

welter pfp
welter
@fun
doesn't have to be too complicated, just enough to validate that the person is human and not trying to game the system
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂  pfp
J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂
@jvaleska.eth
yeah, got it but I would expect false positives, still thinking it should have less weight.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction