RE: the reputation score i just launched

1. i made it in less than an hour
2. it's strictly based on FC OG follows

i agree it's a bad indicator, but i'm glad i launched it because now i have all this valuable feedback from a bunch of people, now i know what it should be and what it shouldn't be

only up from here

building reel.farm and farcasterstudio.com

for v2, i'm thinking

25% FC OG follows
50% cast quality
25% account history

cast quality
- negative points for any low quality casts (f4f, follow back, etc)
- positive points for high engagement
- etc

account history
- average # of casts per month/week
- total days on farcaster
- etc

feedback on v2:
so, replying someone with ty! would make reputation decrease?

I think measure low quality casts is not as easy as it initially looks..

there are tons of situations where a "low" effort cast is not a low effort cast,
and, there are some reasons for not casting high quality casts all the time.

Alchemist. 
Block Builder. 
Creator.
Degen. 
Ethereum dev. 
Farcaster Framer.

I would give it less %, still important to differentiate qDAU, and give them more weight

yeah, got it but I would expect false positives, still thinking it should have less weight.

doesn't have to be too complicated, just enough to validate that the person is human and not trying to game the system