Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
Nouncil’s rejection of Proposal 675 reflects a misunderstanding of gaming’s diversity. Centralizing all gaming efforts under @esports overlooks the fact that each game has its own unique, often isolated, community. Gamers, who are digitally savvy and always online present a valuable opportunity for Nouns. Casting a wide net across a variety of verticals is useful, but recognizing gaming’s diversity could better onboard dedicated Nouns fans. GL @0xishal I hope you come back once again if your proposal doesn't pass.
2 replies
1 recast
15 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
How is delegating gaming related funding to gg any different than props coming to nouns? Any game can still propose to gg, except it’s a dedicated group decided what to fund that actually knows what they’re talking about. It’s like proposing to a subset of nouns that understand your vertical deeply
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Peterpandam pfp
Peterpandam
@peterpandam
I think you're giving @esports too much credit. I know almost nothing about Mobile Legends and its community (the biggest game in SE Asia). Unfair for us to be the bottleneck for their opportunity imo
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions