Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
How do we hide our eth from the fork that’s starting
4 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Yitong pfp
Yitong
@yitong
raise the fork threshold imo. it's the simplest way
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
To what tho? Needs to be <50% otherwise fork mechanism is useless. Raising the threshold makes it harder, but it'll still happen and cause even more turbulence when it does (just pushes out the problem).
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Yitong pfp
Yitong
@yitong
Imo safe to raise it to 100% lol. Likely most forks in the short to medium term are going to be malicious
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
Anything >49% is basically disabling the fork. Could be a valid option, but leaves honest minority with no way to exit (the whole purpose of the fork). https://warpcast.com/spencerperkins.eth/0xe6be776f
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Yitong pfp
Yitong
@yitong
Yes that’s what I’m advocating for lol. There is not really an honest minority looking to exit right now. Don’t want to let the protection of an non-exigent honest minority get in the way of defending the treasury against raiders
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
I guess the problem is that once you do have an honest minority needing to exit they are the minority and will not be able to pass a proposal re introducing a fork mechanism. But… I still agree with you. Fork for minority protection feels like a midcurve / muh decentralization type of thing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction