Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
The recent NounSwap treasury swap props have revived the discussion around permissionless swapping (thanks @frog).

 Curious what the sentiment is around a simple swap contract with a fixed fee going to the treasury? This is similar to what we proposed in NounSwap’s original failed proposal, but based on community feedback, and potentially a shift in sentiment from $nouns wanted to re-engage to see if this is something the DAO would be interested in. The benefit is a new revenue stream for the DAO, and preventing wasting attention and gas of having treasury swap offers going through governance.
3 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
I’m personally in favor of a minimal swapper that accomplishes what is already happening with the proposal based swaps but in a permissionless way. I hear the feedback from some about it wanting nouns to be swappable / fungible but the reality is that $nouns already allows for swaps so it feels futile to try to stop it. Might as well introduce a mechanism that doesn’t require the full attention of the dao and introduces a new revenue stream. I’m curious for the communities thoughts on an fair price point for swapping
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions