Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
SQX
@sqx
Just dropped a grip of no’s in nouncil. - open props - travel and party - expensive dev work when verbs are … - all merch should be pre order - convoluted structures - prop timing. As someone looking at finally buying. Nothing here makes me want to own a noun. Or has me thinking it will be money well spent. I intend to Look at everything from a we are heading to 0 . How to elongate. Not how to take my share. 🫡
8 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
What does verbs are … mean?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
SQX
@sqx
the fact you dont know says it all. elad and david . our 1MM dev team on retainer.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Oh yea I know that, but does your … imply that it’s not a good spend? Imo it’s not a good spend. we shouldn’t have anyone on retainer. The best team for the project should win the project — it encourages more collaboration when everyone feels they have equal opportunity to contribute to protocol
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Just wasn’t sure if you meant it like verbs hasn’t paid off so we shouldn’t fund more dev or like we already fund verbs so let’s give them the work and not fund more devs
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
SQX
@sqx
more we choose a path of 1 team. and they appear to do not much. so something like this seems in that wheel house. I agreed and do agree that more workers kicking tires is better. but again . the dao choose a path. so im trying to stay within. this is specific protocol adjustments.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Agree that it would be great to get an update on what they are doing. Not as much transparency as I’d like to see. The protocol round fiasco left a bad taste in my mouth too. NDT was an exciting thread for them to be pulling on but seems dead now
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
