Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
1/3 Degen Grants & Airdrop 3 โ€“ Need Feedback! We want Airdrop 3 to fund Degen builders through a structured grant system. Weโ€™ll post Statements of Work (SOW), devs will submit proposals & qualifications, and the community votes on who gets the bounty. Voting power is based on $DEGEN or locked $DEGEN. Thoughts?
46 replies
54 recasts
188 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
2/3 This ensures fair funding, efficient dev selection, and no duplicate work. Instead of multiple devs competing for the same task, the community selects the best proposal, and the chosen dev gets to work. Are there platforms that support this model? Any concerns or improvements youโ€™d suggest? Let us know!
1 reply
4 recasts
33 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
3/3 We want Airdrop 3 to empower builders, ensuring a transparent & community-driven process. Devs submit their proposals & qualifications, the community picks the best fit, and work starts. Would love your feedback before we roll this out! What do you think?
4 replies
1 recast
15 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
@downshift.eth @jpren.eth @jessepollak @woj.eth @macbudkowski @edit @fookinnowan @0xen @billzh @purp @joeblau @kenny @we @cryptowenmoon.eth @nonlinear.eth @yuga @nick @yekim.eth @yes2crypto.eth @limone.eth @samuellhuber.eth @ahn.eth @matthewfox @robrecht @linda
9 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Fookinnowan ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต pfp
Fookinnowan ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต
@fookinnowan
The idea of having several people or everybody building the same stuff like what is happening now (similar degen frames with different UI) is great. Just not sure on the selection voting process if it can be done in a fair way
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction