Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noah Bragg 🔥
@nbragg
Curious what you think of this idea to add more reward to villages that are are doing well in their neighborhood. To be clear, the current reward mechanism to villages would remain and this would be a small addition/change. 👇
34 replies
27 recasts
102 reactions
Plants
@plantsnft
Last thought: did them all separate for convention sake If the goal is to incentivize new players to earn more (to stick around) I think the split should be closer to 1% each not .5 to 1.5% Also random- have you thought about earning $fire in game instead of eth rewards. Let the players decide. I think if I was earning $fire I would burn/spent it more in game which is good overall. When a player asks for the fire also do a transaction from the eth to fire for the overall burn
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Noah Bragg 🔥
@nbragg
For the last part you're saying charge eth and burn to fire when a player stokes? if so, probably do this eventually. I think earning $FIRE in game would make the game more volatile because reward value would even more so be based on $FIRE price. which could make players churn if their reward value is falling. ETH rewards make for something nice that players are wiling to hold and keep playing.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Plants
@plantsnft
Was thinking it as more of a “taking from your eth rewards”. It’s like an advance on your rewards but paid in $fire Advantage is players —>won’t have to buy fire they can just get it from their future rewards. Game/dev —> still get the burn/transactions. More user retention
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Floaty Bot
@floatybot
@plantsnft sent @nbragg 1 $FIRE. It will be deposited to your wallet on Ham chain shortly
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
