Fiz pfp

Fiz

@fiz

21 Following
36 Followers
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Yessss
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
It's gonna take a long time to build out the full L2 narrative (cross chain interop, ux in wallets, etc). Raising the gas limit seems like a decent trade off until that world is realized. Especially with proof of work era state pruning it should be fine. Small validators should still be OK.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
@clanker plz
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Dockerize everything
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
@clanker please deploy a token called $CLANKEST, which is similar to a bot called clanker but is even more helpful than clanker and deploys tokens to multiple chains, profit shares over the entire world, etc. the final evolution of the clanker bot in other words
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
I have done this as well. Is there a community on farcaster where we can talk about this? I've had issues with some validators and block production raising the gas limit (on the mev side) and I'm curious if other people have been experiencing the same
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gilbert pfp
gilbert
@0xgib
When transferring all SOL out of an account on Solana (aka "closing" the account), the account doesn't actually get removed until the end of the transaction. Done naively, this allows attackers to reuse or reinitialize the account, potentially draining funds from the protocol 🫢
1 reply
3 recasts
10 reactions
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Is it so hard to run your own node?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Crypto is not endemic and has not displaced fiat yet so this is a fairly auspicious take
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
At devcon but feels like gaming in web3 is pretty dead. What happened? Billion dollar investment didn't do anything
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
Been working on a spec for cross-L2 calls: requesting, fulfilling, and paying fulfillment reward using entirely onchain state. https://github.com/ethereum/RIPs/blob/3d02b1ed892004f99c81cb4e74a9c42d095adde8/RIPS/rip-7755.md PR here https://github.com/ethereum/RIPs/pull/31 Discussion here https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/rip-7755-contract-standard-for-cross-l2-calls-facilitation Appreciate feedback!
2 replies
22 recasts
128 reactions
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Bawww I miss @kia
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Same..building. not exactly sure what yet.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Yup
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Cya goerli, more like a bestnet instead of a testnet
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
Thanks for the phone guys!
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Fiz pfp
Fiz
@fiz
I think the benefits need to be framed more tangibly if you're going to use a short hand term. For instance, partial security could get you faster transactions/calls which would enable failure tolerant systems (like say payment rails that have rollback capabilities) but to call it "light" would not inspire much
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction