Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

polynya pfp
polynya
@polynya
I quit a large audience on Twitter and joined Farcaster a year ago as a direct replacement. I didn't know Varun or Dan, and indeed, anyone else active on Farcaster at the time. While "the list" made sense early on, it should be opt-in recommendations now - the engagement inequality is very real. This is made worse by the hyperfinancialization, where a handful of those people are incentivized to be very active, while a vast majority of the rest are bots. (IMO, as a casual observer nowadays) Farcaster right now should be aggressively focused on social values over financial values (and yes, this is a very direct contradiction and trade-off) - in design, engineering, and most importantly marketing. Unless the terminal addressable market target is degens, which is fair enough.
22 replies
32 recasts
224 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
Honest question: there are basically no financialized features built into Warpcast or the protocol, just open primitives and emergent behavior. If you're designing, engineering, and marketing the main client and core protocol, how do you discourage hyperfinancialization? Social shaming?
10 replies
12 recasts
92 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
I'm curious if most farmers are using warpcast directly or are writing to hubs from other clients
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

senya pfp
senya
@femboy
the bot farms either use custom clients that communicate with Warpcast via requests or interact with Warpcast client directly (seen a video of a 100+ account chinese botfarm that emulates taps, swipes and other things on actual smartphones)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction