Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
F. Dilek Yurdakul π©βοΈ
@fdilekyurdakul
I am curious about your thoughts
5 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Manu Williams π©π΅π
@manuwilliams
As a multidisciplinary artists I utilize various media to create work including AI. Being also a photographer I know however that there is always an intention behind capturing the world around you. With the camera this can either mean documenting real life, expressing emotions with different types of photography techniques like slow shutter, emphasizing the play of light and shadow or whatever it may be. If I were to compare Night Sky photography to an AI generation of the same subject, I will always value the real photograph above the AI for several reasons: The skill and knowledge to capture a sharp, well lit image, the manual post production, the intention and energy spent to look for the location, and finally the spiritual connection with the environment, which always translates into the final photo. This applies to other genres of photography as well, especially portraits ~ which are very personal and require trust and often times a certain relationship to the subject.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Srabanty
@turjoy79
Share your thoughts! Let's chat!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kuntal Singhvi.eth π©
@singhvi
I'm personally not bothered by it In the future I think people will seek out and appreciate real photographs much more We see an inflow of new talent in the industry (or new people learning a skill) when it's cool and Trendy...when AI gets trendy there will be less people entering the photography industry But people want a story or connection when they view or interact with art
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Reza ππ·
@rezabakhshi
100% agree!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NYX ββ¨-β¨
@martiya
AI may not be able to do the work of a good artist, but a good artist can with AI
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
