Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
retroactive grants are cool but they require builders take on all the risk (build it and you *might* get *some* funding) an alternative ✨proactive✨ approach:
26 replies
16 recasts
61 reactions

Evan Hudson pfp
Evan Hudson
@evan-hudson
Cool idea! How could this work for nonprofit/impact-based projects? Also, I would be wary of token-gating participation as I think the act of issuing a token might be self-limiting in the upcoming climate of regulation. Perhaps other mechanisms with similar outcomes could be found (soulbound NFTs for funders etc)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
hmm good question. the same as it does in web2/legacy fundraising, whereby contributors provide financial support directly to the project? would have the added benefit of an onchain record (erc20 contribution tokens https://blog.withfabric.xyz/contribution-tokens) that you could potentially do interesting things with
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions