"The biggest mistake ZK companies make is trying to sell ZK as a product.

It’s not. ZK is a technology.

What you’re really offering is privacy, security, and safety.” 

- @Ismael_H_R at @HouseofZK's Boundless panel at Web3 Festival 🇭🇰 https://t.co/l74C0q2FAS

LAGRANGE

Based

https://x.com/lagrangedev/status/1909252095347241083?s=46

A bold hot take by @Ismael_H_R that I agree with.

ZK is basically just math. Math does not have PMF, but actuary tables do.

Selling ZK is like selling TCP/IP protocols instead of the internet. People don’t care about packet routing - they care about sending emails and browsing

EulerLagrange.eth - shitpost/acc

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist and meme connoisseur.

/opacity
/eulerlagrange

https://x.com/euler__lagrange/status/1909617543741874289?s=46

Privacy is key 
And that’s what zk is offering; the technology of privacy 
Its not a product.

Do you think we’re at the non-speculative product stage of crypto yet? We’re pushing the boulder uphill with our Pakt.build and Pakt.fund platforms but it feels many are running for the exits into AI and degenning