Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/crypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Eddy Lazzarin đźź  pfp
Eddy Lazzarin đźź 
@eddy
Every network token should have an economic model, including the collection of fees that can be used for token buybacks. This helps sustain the value of the token, which can be continuously issued to pay for the growth or operation of the network's marketplace (SOL, ETH, UNI are all examples).
3 replies
0 recast
29 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth - shitpost/acc pfp
EulerLagrange.eth - shitpost/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Does there always need to be a scarce/limited resource associated with a token? SOL/ETH -> Blockspace Uni -> Liquidity Helium -> Coverage Daylight -> Energy
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Eddy Lazzarin đźź  pfp
Eddy Lazzarin đźź 
@eddy
The thing in common here isn’t “scarcity” per se but that each of these are decentralized network-marketplaces and on the right you are listing the goods they are selling. All network tokens are integral to a (decentralized) network (marketplace).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
Scarcity is the key factor when you assess supply vs demand. It doesn’t make sense to overfixate on artificial scarcity but there needs to be an equilibrium bw supply & demand to have sustainable growth. For example, I would argue that ETH doesn’t need scarce blockspace to be valuable but a scarce amount of tokens to be used as money/store of value. https://x.com/jrmr92/status/1912875978172354708
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction