Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/190.pdf "Short-lived zero-knowledge proofs and signatures" Apparently my off the dome idea was written as a paper by J. Bonneau. Admittedly his thinking is more concrete than my casts
6 replies
0 recast
21 reactions

binocularsXLšŸŽ© pfp
binocularsXLšŸŽ©
@binocularsx
Is there a ā€œzero-knowledge protocol for dummiesā€ book? I understand the general concept but you just took me for a spin rnšŸ˜­
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
You ever hear the where's Waldo example?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
https://warpcast.com/eulerlagrange.eth/0x389db45b
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

binocularsXLšŸŽ© pfp
binocularsXLšŸŽ©
@binocularsx
So to prove Waldo (knowledge) is there while not giving any information on where he is (data). As long as itā€™s correct Okay Iā€™m following now, thanks for the example
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
There's two parts of "ZK" 1. Verifiable compute 2. Hiding inputs For privacy preservation we care about #2 (prove you're over 21 w/o disclosing bday). Sometimes we don't care about hiding inputs but just want to reduce a lot of compute into a short proof, like a "zk-rollup" which academics will say should be called a validity rollup
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

binocularsXLšŸŽ© pfp
binocularsXLšŸŽ©
@binocularsx
So if I was to fill a form that asks me to prove Iā€™m over 21 The input I put in wonā€™t be seen by the other party? But it will show that I am in fact over 21
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction