Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
A thought occurred to me about how FC can scale. So the main network can store the highest priority messages, like follows. So the social graph always follow you around. High traffic topics can be moved into a separate subnet. For example the xxx messages, and that can be subdivided further if needed…
2 replies
3 recasts
31 reactions
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Not convinced this is the best approach, but it is an approach. The downside is the network splits into distinct shards, but the identity layer is the same. So a user can always re-sign messages into a different network, or insist on the higher cost of the main network.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
Similar to how Mastodon has servers but decentralize the identity layer?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Never looked at it. I guess the federated approach is a common denominator 😅
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Genuinely curious @v, any reason you think the federated approach wouldn’t work? At the end of the day this can be done without really changing the FC protocol as it is today.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction