0age pfp
0age
@0age
imagine ECDSA is demonstrated to be broken by quantum computing tomorrow now everyone’s scrambling to move funds into a smart wallet with quantum-resistant signature verification ASAP what’s the best implementation of this currently out there? does one even exist?
11 replies
42 recasts
134 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
curious if @vitalik.eth has thought about this
6 replies
31 recasts
84 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Sha256 and similar hash functions are considered quantum safe. STARKs use hash functions heavily and so are also considered quantum safe. So in a pinch you could hard fork an upgrade where everyone switches to a new key, and a zk proof of knowledge is used for the new private key instead of normal signatures.
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Shriphani Palakodety pfp
Shriphani Palakodety
@shriphani
zk signatures are not small - many applications rely on small signatures. It is going to be a pretty rough upgrade with a lot of systems needing a do-over
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
It wouldn’t be painless no doubts I think the AA bundler system could be repurposed to wrap many ZKPs into one to make it more bearable.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction