Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/evm-6
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange.eth
If there was the inverse of gas to delete data from the EVM (ik, doesn’t affect history), what are the implications? Open question is where the ETH comes from. Doesn’t effect history, but decreases size of the EVM you need to run calls.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Nexton A
@nexton
You mean selfdestruct?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange.eth
That’s just for a contract, I mean in general.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
What's more general than a contract? :D IIRC the active storage slots are a fairly small percentage of total storage required for a full node.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange.eth
You could delete an nft. So if you’re airdropped something useless you could get paid to remove it from the EVM
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange.eth
Admittedly it’s a half baked idea. Less than half. Just thought it was an interesting design space
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
It is an interesting thought, but I think the incentive would need to be with the contract deployer rather than just the tx executor (which also makes it weird), especially since I'm not obligated to even include a delete function in my contract.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction