Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
some thoughts for many types of content, it makes sense to auto have a coin or mass abundance, 100 pennies still = $1 however, bucketing artists in “coining everything” feels off - i am no expert, but art has been around for millennia and it’s often valued based on scarcity, emotion, feel i don’t believe abundance and scarcity are mutually exclusive in this new world, both should exist onchain for various purposes global liquidity benefits 1/1s, open editions, and coins ALL of these are ownership breakthroughs, not just coins 1/1 ~= art in an exhibition/museum open edition ~= postcards/stamps (ht @wanderloots.eth) coin ~= fractionalized representation of content my whole point is to say there isn’t one “right” way - and i don’t think we as a collective whole should push for a certain way over another, the goal is choice/freedom a tiktok video? prob great as a coin! art/photography? i personally lean towards editions or 1/1 the key is choice where the main onchain distribution lives
12 replies
6 recasts
37 reactions
Luigi Stranieri pfp
Luigi Stranieri
@luigistranieri
Freedom of choice is fundamental. Everyone has the right to choose what is best for his work (of course I’m talking from the photographer side). I think we need to separate the value from the price. As you said, value can be based by scarcity and emotions, but the price is a mere number created by the market. Coining everything eliminates automatically the value from the equation and keep the focus only on the price. My conclusion is: I am wary of artists who focus on price.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
great thoughts, i am with u on all of em when i collect photography i don’t think about price whatsoever
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Luigi Stranieri pfp
Luigi Stranieri
@luigistranieri
Exactly 💯 Coining everything is just good for speculation. My 2cents
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions