Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
some thoughts for many types of content, it makes sense to auto have a coin or mass abundance, 100 pennies still = $1 however, bucketing artists in “coining everything” feels off - i am no expert, but art has been around for millennia and it’s often valued based on scarcity, emotion, feel i don’t believe abundance and scarcity are mutually exclusive in this new world, both should exist onchain for various purposes global liquidity benefits 1/1s, open editions, and coins ALL of these are ownership breakthroughs, not just coins 1/1 ~= art in an exhibition/museum open edition ~= postcards/stamps (ht @wanderloots.eth) coin ~= fractionalized representation of content my whole point is to say there isn’t one “right” way - and i don’t think we as a collective whole should push for a certain way over another, the goal is choice/freedom a tiktok video? prob great as a coin! art/photography? i personally lean towards editions or 1/1 the key is choice where the main onchain distribution lives
12 replies
6 recasts
37 reactions

Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
and lastly, i think it’s cool what base did today, a great example of using a new tool/framework to experiment the example today is the type of content i see a coin making sense for point above isn’t about how they did it, it’s about how i see it on the artist side of things
1 reply
1 recast
13 reactions

Luigi Stranieri pfp
Luigi Stranieri
@luigistranieri
Freedom of choice is fundamental. Everyone has the right to choose what is best for his work (of course I’m talking from the photographer side). I think we need to separate the value from the price. As you said, value can be based by scarcity and emotions, but the price is a mere number created by the market. Coining everything eliminates automatically the value from the equation and keep the focus only on the price. My conclusion is: I am wary of artists who focus on price.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Push pfp
Push
@push-
So really curious about it: what do you think about a coin that updates everyday rather then coining every single artwork everyday?🤔
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JC pfp
JC
@jonathancolton
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Juliettemeon 🎩 pfp
Juliettemeon 🎩
@juliettemeon.eth
111 $DEGEN Appreciate your look 🫂
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ifewasabi pfp
Ifewasabi
@ifewasabi
Well said Eriks. Love your thoughts on the matter
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
💯
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Brandon Yoshizawa 🎩🔵💎 pfp
Brandon Yoshizawa 🎩🔵💎
@bay-photography
Same convo we had and still not a fan of coining everything. Especially not my art
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵 pfp
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@carculture.eth
Great summation of my thoughts
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Srivatsan sankaran  pfp
Srivatsan sankaran
@srimoam
This kind of categorical thought would help to decide the future 🔥🔥 We need more people like you!!!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

EntⓂ️an 💎 🎩 pfp
EntⓂ️an 💎 🎩
@entman
Great take — really appreciate the nuance here. The idea that abundance and scarcity can coexist onchain is super important. Too often we treat them as binary, but in reality, they serve different roles depending on the intent behind the content. Totally agree that not everything needs to be coined — art especially carries weight through context, intention, and rarity. Forcing uniformity risks flattening that depth. Your analogy breakdown (1/1, OE, coin) is spot on — each has its own cultural and functional lane. The win is in enabling creators to choose the format that aligns best with their vision, not locking them into one mold. Choice is the unlock.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Myza pfp
Myza
@joybrishti
Totally agree—there’s no one right way. Coins, editions, 1/1s all have value. It’s about giving creators the freedom to choose what fits their work best.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction