Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
channels as standalone apps will likely make a lot of sense as the network scales - features built unique to that community ownership + portability to other apps/communities still at the forefront
20 replies
7 recasts
33 reactions

Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
Disagree, people don’t like to install new apps, they prefer apps that can do more (but not super apps, at least in the US) Warpcast is powerful because it puts all of the channels in one place, that’s a good thing
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
i agree, but think there is room for both i.e. i’d like to see espn integrate the fc social graph and have commentary based on that in specific niche channels believe that is way to onboarding billions to fc sooner - versus doing so only through bringing them onto a social super app like warpcast
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
Yes, in that case I would consider than the ESPN app (a sports app) that is Farcaster-integrated rather than a "channel app" (channel is the main thing) I do think more FC-integrated apps will be a great thing although there's not a super clear case yet for why ESPN would choose to use FC over building their own
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction