Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
AA fam, how are we thinking about the intersection of modules and keystore rollup? Namely, I assume if a user wants a module on one chain they probably want on all. What’s the best approach?
4 replies
7 recasts
168 reactions

eric.base.eth 🔵 pfp
eric.base.eth 🔵
@ericbrown.eth
If modules are deployed to the same addresses across chains, L2 accounts could query the L1 account for approved modules so that they don’t need to be approved on every chain. Inspo from https://hackmd.io/@i275DA5ZRjOAeSFUkffw5Q/H1rQQwY9n @rhinestone team, figure you may have thoughts?
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
Yeah but part of the goal of the keystore rollup is giving users a single source of truth signer even when addresses differ. I’m not sure modules at the same address should be designed around
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

eric.base.eth 🔵 pfp
eric.base.eth 🔵
@ericbrown.eth
To have crosschain modules, something about their addresses must be standardized. Either they are the same across all chains Or A registry of a module’s crosschain addresses needs to be maintained Imo it’s easier to simply deploy to the same address on all chains with CREATE2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction