vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I support freedom of speech. But I have not followed a single discussion about it that isn't either superficial and/or biased. I see people who blame Brazil for banning X (did they actually do it?) but are ok with US banning TikTok. Others who fight freedom of speech and at the same time dream of living in Dubai. I recently listened to a respected crypto founder who wants to leave Canada for UAE. And then 5 minutes later, he is discussing how crazy it is that France arrested Pavel Durov. Wtf? https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/websites-blocked-in-uae/
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Eric P. Rhodes
@epr
Conflating and comparing both bans as free speech issues misses some key factors. The potential ban of TikTok centers on national security concerns, not free speech. U.S. law prohibits foreign governments from having direct or indirect control over media companies operating within the country. In 2021, the Chinese government acquired a "golden share" in a ByteDance subsidiary, which allows it to appoint board members and exert influence, raising concerns about potential government interference.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I totally understand why the US went this way. Of course, "national security" is US gov excuse to bypass laws, but I honestly think in this case they are in the right direction (not sure of the actual outcome, but that's a totally different discussion). Now, the French law prohibits child pornography. It is my understanding that the French authorities asked Telegram to take measures agains it, give user data related to users accused of it, etc, and Telegram denied to cooperate. Isn't it expected that they would take legal action against the company and the CEO? Why is it about freedom of speech?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Eric P. Rhodes
@epr
well, France didn’t ban Telegram, which is an important distinction. Durov holds French citizenship, so he's bound by French law. even as a free speech absolutist, he’s not immune to the consequences of his actions. in France, freedom of speech isn’t absolute like in the US; it operates within a legal framework that balances individual freedoms with public order, national security, and protections against hate speech and defamation. just believing in free speech doesn’t exempt you from the law. you can be upset that France arrested Durov, but he’s still accountable for his actions under French law.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
> freedom of speech isn’t absolute like in the US Well, in theory. But the First Amendment did not protect the Hollywood in the 50s and the victims of McCarthy's prosecutions (excused by national security). Americans should remain vigilant too, and not ignore the ways and the excuses used to limit freedom of speech in the US, too. (Which is holding one the top places in the rank, right now, I agree.)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
> Durov holds French citizenship, so he's bound by French law This is not correct. He was arrested because his company is accused of acting illegally in France. His French citizenship is actually giving him more protection. (Just like a US citizen accused in the US has more protection than a foreigner.)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction