Does offering editions hurts your future collectibility? Arthemort thinks so. But I offer alternative ideas on how to think abt distribution in a networked environment.

Arthemort thinks: https://x.com/Arthemort/status/1756738368421925306

I think: https://www.secondrealm.com/posts/on-deciding-how-to-mint-your-art/

Thinks out loud via /epr, forms ideas via paragraph.xyz/@epr , previously /secondrealm, asks questions in /cryptoart, & talks crypto on pods.media/rising-tide

Artist.
Art x Blockchain.
Something for you 👉 https://paragraph.xyz/@jorge
🐦 https://twitter.com/nftjorge

I think @artthemort feigns experience he doesn't have. Things are more nuanced, especially the trad art world. There are for example endless editions of Warhols that are cheap and lack quality, as we all know this didn't effect his wider market. I think this is captured by your article which is beautifully written!

🔥 thank you.i agree. there's a lack of awareness of warhol and even the broader consumer art market (think Kinkade)

think about how many wall calendars and posters people have of Dali too. the more i think about it, the more this feels like it's art gallery/auction house centric.

Exactly. Without naming names, many who are ‘recognised’ as having experience in trad art in our space have close to 0