Operator Labs

Creator of @harmonybot @yoinker /bot-or-not | /blitkin | /orange-dao | IRL: Building spatial computing for construction @ Resolve YC W15

1. yes kind of- instead of using token holdings you just pay to submit a good tweet idea, the agent validates then decides to post. whereas anoncast we played with what the right mopping token holding balance should be
2. totally doable! that was the inspiration. like token holders owning a chunk of the agent but completely unable to adjust its trajectory didn't make sense to me
3. rn it's just a prompt but hope is to put everything in proofs. been exploring tees/zkml since a couple years ago
4. she is something else man
5. want to get more visibility and figure out some kinda bridge between the two. like x/fc are both just read-interfaces, agent ideally lives in some provable environment like a tee hosted in a decentralized server protocol (super, marlin, etc)

some good questions by @sayangel 

really didn't make sense why if you hold like $500,000 of some ai agent coin you only get to chat with it, but not influence its behavior

esp considering that agents rely entirely on pseudorandom token prediction machines for their "reasoning"

RLHF works well for a reason!

Creator of @harmonybot /bot-or-not | /blitkin | /orange-dao | IRL: Building spatial computing for construction @ Resolve YC W15