Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Nat Emodi pfp
Nat Emodi
@emodi
as a builder, how do you think about prioritizing features? thinking about this cast from @dwr.eth https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x46e747da
5 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

aaronv pfp
aaronv
@aaronv.eth
sometimes features are table stakes & necessary simply to avoid the "doesn't have" wen ur a new product entering an existing market. beyond that, i always asked teams to focus on value and function then design the feature set
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
80% vision 20% user requests
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

typo.eth pfp
typo.eth
@typo
Sometimes competitive-parity is a necessary evil. + I don’t know that usage stats for something like long casts is a good indicator of value. Not every cast needs to be an essay, but knowing it’s possible is… nice?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Truedrew pfp
Truedrew
@truedrew
There’s definitely an art to balancing all the different inputs… what people say, what they actually need, short term vs long term, maintenance, optics, etc. Probably no right answer beyond first principles thinking and aiming to stay a step ahead of both users and competition.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction