Ethereum

Regarding the Lido stake holdings, which of this do you think is actually the biggest lift?
- Convince Lido to self limit. 
- Vampire by offering real incentives to exchange stETH. 
- Implement an enshrined solution. 
- Accept the market decision, and compel Lido to truly decentralize via governance or social slashing.

> Vampire by offering real incentives to exchange stETH. 

More reasonable, give stakers increased ROA via extra tokens like UNI, USDC, etc.

> Accept the market decision, and compel Lido to truly decentralize via governance or social slashing.

Ethereum has no governance. Forced social slashing is neo-fascist.

prev. EY-Parthenon | JPMorganChase&Co





Twitter🐦: x.com/0xMawuko
























Probably doing stuff and things.

> Convince Lido to self limit.

Lol

> Implement an enshrined solution. 

The only real solution, a bit late tho.

If by ‘vote it’ you mean:

- voting for self-limitation, that assumes that the Lido constitution(if one exists) permits such proposals to be made.

- Lido governance == Ethereum governance, then this assumes that Lido control over 51% of active stake with support from the hegemons like Coinbase, Circle, Infura etc.

What about Lido governance? Buy enough LDO and vote it.