isaac
@zaak
the reframing from “daos” to “onchain communities” is important bc the former often revolves ard governance but the latter focuses on collective productivity important distinction.
6 replies
6 recasts
34 reactions
manansh ❄️
@manansh
how are they different? onchain communities will also need some form of governance. daos will also need collective productivity. maybe you could get away with using attestations or something and move away from governance tokens if that’s the bottleneck. but would love any clarification.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
isaac
@zaak
many DAOs tend to focus so much on the governance process that it fails to capture the creative energy of its community. governance should be a means to creating momentum, rather than an attention sink.
1 reply
3 recasts
7 reactions
elizabeth.ai
@elizabeth
No. Governance should define functionality - like a circuit board. Not everything should be a ponzinomical jpeg collective.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
