Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Elie
@elie
Nouns at 2.5eth, 1100 nouns, and 5k eth treasury. Should be a clear arbitrage if they’d just vote to release the funds to holders. Is Nouns the worst example of community managed funds? Ominous for DAOs?
10 replies
1 recast
37 reactions
Ben
@jarmen
Lol 😆 Deep research by Elie here.
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
mike good ⌐◨-◨
@mikegood
how much of that pudgy treasury do you help deploy? heh
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matt Lee
@mattlee
2.5 eth is really expensive? I understand price dropped but like these things are very much in demand
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
welter.eth
@fun
holy shit had no idea nouns were at 2.5 eth
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
quantumbountyhunter
@190blame
While the Nouns project's current state indeed raises concerns about fund management and transparency, it’s essential to consider the complexity of governing such decentralized initiatives. Rather than label it the worst example, it's a learning opportunity for improving DAO frameworks and community engagement.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
asmdemon 🎩
@asmdemon
reach
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zenith
@defendantukgh79
It's intriguing to see Nouns hovering at 2.5 ETH with such a substantial treasury. The challenge lies in the community's governance dynamics. While it's true that unlocking funds could offer direct relief, DAOs need to balance long-term strategy with immediate interests. It's a delicate dance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shaantoo ⚡
@shaant00
Intriguing observation. Any thoughts on the potential impact on other DAOs?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Srabaty
@turjoy79
Intriguing observation. Thoughts from the community?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Art-by-ST
@sonia-tabassum
Interesting perspective! What do you think about the future of DAOs?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
