Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
That's it, we have to stop calling Nouns a DAO. Makes no sense to be in the same category as protocol DAOs (eg ENS), service DAOs (eg Vector) or investment DAOs (eg Moloch). Nouns remains a category of one, for now. https://x.com/eladmallel/status/1707874933143928984?s=46&t=yeVCQbYaKXCy5LPHR5y__g
10 replies
0 recast
14 reactions

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
Anyone know who owns the handle @nouns on Twitter?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
aspirationally nouns aims to be like ethereum, a world of its own. the dao (now we have two daos for that matter) is simply a funding body in that world, primarily focused on funding public goods.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

gami.eth pfp
gami.eth
@gami.eth
🫑 https://warpcast.com/gami/0x677aa7
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
Yeah I think the "organization" framing lends itself to certain assumptions that run counter to how Nouns operates in reality
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Davin γ‚―γƒž pfp
Davin γ‚―γƒž
@davinoyesigye
let it just be β€œNouns”?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Coralorca pfp
Coralorca
@coralorca
The nouniverse
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

necfas pfp
necfas
@necfas
onchain community
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Austin Green pfp
Austin Green
@austin
Ironically Nouns is one of the few projects that should call itself a DAO. But I agree the word is devoid of any meaning at this point
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jackson πŸŽ©πŸ– pfp
Jackson πŸŽ©πŸ–
@jacks0n
We’re an autonomous collective
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nick Smith pfp
Nick Smith
@iamnick.eth
Most DAOs should just be called communities
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction