Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

As long as I have a vote, I'll vote against props with the main objective in "onboarding" and "onboarding masses".

The flywheel of this experiment only works with self sustaining momentum when we collectively stop externalizing and start leaning into what we have, and further cultivate that.

for us > onboarding more

I acknowledge that there is a sense of prestige and the idea of legacy to ship a prop that "will (finally) onboard masses". However I highly doubt that this is what we collectively really want.

In the words of Seth Godin, we ultimately want more people who like things we like and do the things we do.

And to achieve that it means to cultivate, celebrate and cherish what we have and who we have amongst us - do more of the all the things we like and the things we do. 

Funnier, better, nicer, weirder, ... more for us.

"For us" also means "for people like us". Eventually people like us will discover us, because:

People like us enjoy the same places and cherish the same things.

This is Nouns.

Ummmm, I doubt this part.

> The flywheel of this experiment only works with self sustaining momentum when we collectively stop externalizing and start leaning into what we have, and further cultivate that.

The fork mechanism allows arbitrageurs to enter anytime, so NounsDAO must continually use funds to acquire new users. Without onboarding, an exclusive community will see its treasury eroded by arbitrageurs.

To keep the flywheel of our community spinning, onboarding new members is essential. This influx ensures growth, resilience, and financial contributions. Like a VC succeeding with one out of a hundred investments, we need to support new initiatives to achieve significant successes.

Focusing solely on "for us" risks stagnation and vulnerability. Welcoming new members brings fresh ideas, diverse perspectives, and financial support, essential for long-term success and sustainability.