Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/coins
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EdisonChen不是陈冠希
@edisonchen
When I hear you guys discussing contentcoins, it reminds me that @Jam app was one of the earliest innovative experimenters. Does anyone remember it? So how should we value a piece of content? Is it based on whether it is an interesting idea or who published it? Is it based on the quality of the content itself or who has complied with the rules of the information distribution platform?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
cryptopanda
@oxcryptopanda
In fact there are differences between jam and zora , jam used curve bonding for price but Zora uses Uniswap v4 lp. More effective and more available for users outside.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
183Aaros.base.eth🔵🔴
@183aaros.eth
内容感觉可以从传播性和质量两个维度进行评价，当然传播性好的质量也不一定差，这种二极管是为了便于讨论进行的前提假设。 视频、Gif 类作品肯定传播性会强于高质量、艰深、严肃的内容，但另一方面质量高的内容可能会在后续社区（“每个好的内容都值得有一个 7/24 社区”）建设方面得到更强的粘性。 短期价值看传播性，长期价值看质量？ 当然这一切都要建立在评价体系不崩塌、流动性还在的基础上，如果流动性枯竭，好像和 NFTs 也没什么区别 ... memes 的长期 L 型太普遍了，也如 @wbnns 所说，任何文化标签的传播热度都是类似的走势，如果热度是价格，那么所有 hashtag 都已 rugged。 可能看作纯消费支出比较好，但这又需要配套用户交互的场域、留存粘性，至少也要做一些策展，如即刻、机核。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
