daos

1 human 1 vote. This, in my opinion, is the way a DAO needs to be structured(not all DAOs but most). We just keep giving the people with the most money, the most power. Which ya know....most people will disagree with if you ask them....but then we bake it into our systems of governance anyway....why do we keep shooting ourselves in the foot and then pretend that it is someone else's fault? When will we hold ourselves accountable? All power to all the people. ✊

Different DAOs should have different voting mechanisms. Those are the rules of engagement. Am fond of systems where voting power is earned not bought

Building /farcastle. Tryna help humans coordinate. Just /yeet it. TANSTAAFL! https://bootleggers.wtf/

Its a balance of power that needs to be figured out on a case by case basis for sure.

Solarpunk ☀️
/replacereality 
 /flows
/permacoolture

If buying power gives you control of the treasury that is what people are incentivized to do

I absolutely agree. How do you incentivize people to buy more if they dont have more "influence" vs someone who might buy significantly less? I am trying to figure this out myself for my desert project. Quadratic voting?

Separate tokens for voting and financial stake

hmmmmm. what if there is no monetary upside except maybe the NFT appreciating in value because of the assets being held by the DAO?

Getting assets into the DAO is tough without monetary upside

Probably gonna need both financial capital and sweat equity. Figuring out how they are related and what provides access to what is where the magic happens

what if benefit was physical access to properties held in the DAOs land trust?