Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Reposting since a bunch of people didn't see the thread from this weekend: the plan for channels.
5 replies
3 recasts
22 reactions
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
Assuming this means no more FIP-2 as currently constructed once things are ironed out and channels move to the protocol?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It may still be FIP-2 compatible but no promises. Want to optimize for the winning configuration long-term. We're also still not sure channels are *the thing*
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction